- Enter a buy and a sell order overnight for each of the three contracts covered in the Naturus daily worksheet: oil futures, gold futures and the e-minis (i.e. a total of six orders each trading day).
- All orders are good “day-only” — automatically cancelled at the close of the day session.
- Place a hard stop on every order: $300 for gold and the ES, $400 for oil.
- If an order is filled, cancel the opposite order, i.e. order-cancels-order.
- If an order is filled, and not stopped out, cover it market-on-close.
How to use Nat’s inflection points
What are these trades?
How much money do they make?
What’s the best way to trade them?
Naturally enough we’ve also been receiving questions about the overall results of these calls, and about how to use them. So we ran a number of simulations comparing the inflection points to the actual market price action for the first two months of 2019. Here’s what we found.
We will be posting the full results as well as a spreadsheet of the data collected, so you can do your own analysis. You may find an even more profitable way to trade Nat’s inflection points. Stay tuned.
The trading rules
After some experimentation we settled on a very simple trading method:
All of these actions can be accomplished with limit orders placed in the evening (Eastern time) after the markets are closed and the daily workbook is published.
There is no need to watch the market after the orders are placed, and because the orders are good “day only” they qualify for (much lower) day — instead of overnight — margins
The entire process should require no more than an hour a day in the evening to place orders and record the results.
This is a mechanical, systematic method of trading, and limiting losses is automatic … as long as you faithfully follow the system.
Barring slippage, the maximum daily loss is three orders filled and all three stopped out on the same day. The maximum loss for a day like that would be $1000 — gold and the ES stopped out for a loss of $300 each and oil stopped out for a loss of $400. That occurred once in the 46 days in this study.
The second and third largest daily losses would be $700 or $600 — two orders filled and both stopped out, with no offsetting winners. That happened twice in the 46 days in this study.
In total, of the 46 days in the study, there were net losses on 14 days. The longest losing streak was three days, for a total loss of $503.50.
We experimented with different stops, both larger and smaller.
Tighter stops decreased the max loss per trade, but increased the number of times the trades were stopped out, and missed some highly profitable trades. Larger stops did not seem to catch more trades, but increased the total amount of losses.
We settled on stops of $300 for gold and the ES, $400 for oil. This level gave the best result for us, but Your Mileage May Vary.
Table: Weekly results, First Quarter, 2019
Which contracts work best?
No question: Oil is the most profitable contract to trade, by a long shot.
For the first Quarter of 2019, trades on oil contracts were far better than the other two combined and accounted for most of the profit. Trades on both the e-mini and gold futures showed a modest profit, but almost all the gains came from trading oil futures.
Over the first quarter, Oil trades produced gains of just a little less than $7,000; gold and the ES produced gains of about $1,500 each.
And oil trades were profitable right from the beginning. The cumulative profit/loss for oil trades turned positive after the first two days, and stayed positive for the entire 13 weeks.
Compare the following charts.
Profit/Loss results by contract
Cumulative results for E-minis, Oil, Gold and all three combined for the first quarter of 2019. Each bar represents one day and shows the cumulative net profit/loss including that day. Each group of bars represents the daily results for one week. Click charts to enlarge.
Oil only trades
In view of the vastly superior results from the oil trades, we separated out the results if only the oil calls were traded. Here’s what we got.
|Oil Trades - Q1, 2019||Total Value||Number||Average Value|
|Consecutive winners||4||Value:||Total: $2660|
|Consecutive losers||3||Value:||Total: $1200|
Overall, there were more losers than winners, in a ratio of roughly 4:3. But the winners were roughly twice as large.
Those results make it worthwhile to consider trading only the oil calls: one-third of the risk, one-third of the effort, and almost as much profit.
However markets run in streaks, and the relative profitability of different contracts can easily change. The daily range of oil during the time period was higher than for the other contracts and that affects the results; the more it moves the greater the opportunity.
To be continued
We will continue to update these results with current trades every month. If you would like a copy of the raw data to run your own analysis, please send a note to firstname.lastname@example.org. Here is the spreadsheet used to draw the charts and the associated data (automatic download in xlsx format).
Please use the Comments below for questions or observations.